Formal technical review (FTR) is a software quality control activity performed by software engineers. If the project only has a few errors, the team asks that the errors be corrected and there are no further review meetings. During this stage of the process, responsible management ensures that the software review has all the necessary resources, including items such as staff, time, materials and tools. Examine the suitability of the software product for its intended use and identifies discrepancies with specifications and standards.
According to the capacity maturity model, the main objective of peer review is to provide “a disciplined engineering practice to detect or correct defects in software artifacts, preventing them from being filtered into field operations. Software review is an important part of the software development life cycle (SDLC) that helps software engineers validate the quality, functionality, and other vital software features and components. Before completing the review, all activities considered necessary for an effective review of the software are verified. It is the systematic examination of a document by one or more people, who work together to find 26% of software errors and defects during the early stages of the software development life cycle (SDLC).
This can be a software design document or a source code for a program, but use cases, business process definitions, test case specifications, and a variety of other technical documents may also be subject to technical review. The entry criteria use a standard checklist to ensure an ideal condition for a successful review. The review leader is responsible for performing administrative tasks related to the review, ensuring orderly conduct, and ensuring that the review meets its objectives. Similarly, software review is a complete process that results in a careful examination of a software product at a meeting or at any event.
A review is a type of test in which a group of people discuss the product produced by the developer, detects errors, and attempts to correct them systematically. The Recorder documents anomalies, action items, decisions, and recommendations made by the review team. The decision maker (the person for whom the technical review is conducted) determines whether the objectives of the review have been met. If the project has a significant number of errors, they reject the model, request to modify it, and hold another review meeting.
During this process, a formal review panel or board considers the steps necessary for the next life cycle.
