What is peer review in sdlc?

In software development, peer review is a type of software review in which the author's colleagues examine a work product (document, code, or other) in order to evaluate the technical content and quality of the work product. Code review is a process by which developers review each other's source code.

What is peer review in sdlc?

In software development, peer review is a type of software review in which the author's colleagues examine a work product (document, code, or other) in order to evaluate the technical content and quality of the work product. Code review is a process by which developers review each other's source code. Peer code review not only improves the code, but also creates better teams. The code review process encourages the exchange of ideas between the team and provides an opportunity for new developers to gain skills and improve the performance of their code.

The ability to easily and thoroughly review these documents is critical to ensuring that everyone is up to date, which is especially important when teams are faced with demands and changes in last-minute customer requirements. Peer review helps measure quality control practices in software development by allowing teams to review their development artifacts early and frequently. The programmer must recognize that the suggested changes are not personal attacks, and reviewers must recognize the programmer's author pride. In addition to correcting errors and improving software quality, code review improves your software development processes and the overall team.

The reviewer is quite familiar with the known problems in the codebase and the complexity of the project. Consistent review of all development artifacts helps teams meet specific project and delivery objectives. Participants should review the code and other materials before the meeting and prepare to discuss their topics without having to re-read the material during the meeting. In these situations, the ability to collaboratively review artifacts breaks these isolation silos and helps everyone meet deadlines and budget objectives.

Tools, such as Collaborator, save time by allowing multiple reviewers to comment and annotate the always-updated version of the document, eliminating the comment reconciliation step required by reviewing Microsoft Word and PDF. Tool-assisted peer review streamlines the process by eliminating scheduled meetings and, at the same time, providing feedback on the code and important technical documents. Therefore, members of the development team know the product in detail and software developers learn to make better estimates of the reviewer's future work. A peer review, a review technique, which consists of a static white box test that is carried out to detect defects early in the life cycle that cannot be detected using black box testing techniques.

During a peer review, the code is inspected to identify potential improvements and ensure that business requirements are met. The affected code and other project components, such as documentation, test cases, project schedule, or changes in requirements, should also be available to review participants. A peer review, sometimes referred to as a code review or walkthrough, is a comprehensive, technical and logical, line-by-line review of a code module (program, subroutine, object, method, etc.).

Bert Knock
Bert Knock

Total food practitioner. Extreme food enthusiast. Proud zombie expert. Total music nerd. Certified travel evangelist. Proud pop culture practitioner.